Cloth throughout history worn for a political, personal or functional reason. Muslim cloth in general and Hijab in particular, have triggered so much debate and controversial in this country. America seemed obsessed with what Muslim women wear or don’t wear as if the only problem we are facing in this country. where, Political hijab is celebrated everyday in the White House and national news. The symbolism of Muslim hijab ranges from an oppression of Muslim women to a strong identity and a strong feminist stand. Lately we have two Muslim women who used hijab to break ground with totally different symbolism. “Halima Aden and Rep. Ilhan Omar. “Halima Aden both, brook ground and Made History as the First Model to Wear a Hijab and Burkini in Sports Illustrated Swimsuit. “ screamed the headline of the Sports Illustrated Magazine, SI, on the front page , the 21 year old Somali Muslim playfully lying on the beach wearing her sexy burkini swimsuit. I’m not sure about the business of Breaking history and being first. lots of Muslims women wear burkini on the beach, swim with their everyday cloth which a wholesome sexy too for lots of onlookers.
Thomas Friedman, the winner of three Pulitzer prizes, the New York Times foreign affairs columnist, with host of bestseller books, a man known for his big ideas. Friedman never ceases to amaze us with a new ‘big idea’ every now and then, from the bizarre to the ridiculous. Consider these examples. First, there is the ‘burger’ war theory: “No two countries with McDonalds go to war with each other”, but when they do, as Belén Fernández reported in Alter Net online magazine, “… in which case it is preferable if the outcome of the conflict indicates that Serbs ‘wanted to stand in line for burgers, much more than they wanted to stand in line for Kosovo.’
Or consider this big idea, in “The world is Flat,” in which he discovered that the Internet leveled the playing field, and an Indian man with a modem can now compete with General Motors, or IBM. In his book, “The Lexus and the Olive Tree,” Mr. Friedman professed that ‘Globalization is what is new…world affairs today can only be explained as the interaction between what is new as an Internet website, and what is old, as a gnarled olive tree on the banks of the river Jordan.'(p.25)
It is worth noting that this book was primarily based on one visit to an automated car plant in Tokyo, where cars are made almost entirely by robots. Would it have been a different premise if he had visited a sweatshop in China, or Vietnam? On his return on a train, he read an article about people in Beirut and Jerusalem who were fighting over who owned which olive tree, and, hence, the juxtaposition of these two ideas.
I would contend that rather than a big idea, what is behind most of the fighting around the worlds is competition for resources. Mr. Friedman has a great affinity for what is new and what modern technology can offer humanity in solving our social and cultural problems,
Thomas Friedman also has a knack for ignoring history, facts, and socio-political realities; he can reduce a complicated social issue to a sound bite and a six-grade essay, and he build his big ideas, based on anecdotal personal experience, or a friend or a trip to place or conversation in hotel bar, here is a templet to how to write like Thomas Friedman, BY MICHAEL WARD
.. CREAT YOUR OWN THOMAS FRIEDMAN OP-ED COLUMN
Here are a few more of his big ideas over the last 20 years, as researched by Belén Fernández, enjoy the ride!
*2004: If the U.S. lowers its profile in the Arab world, the Arabs will realize that their children are being outperformed academically by the children of their maids.
*2003: Saudi Arabia suffers from an excess of democracy.
*2002 Massacres of Muslims are a sign of freedom.
* and most of all he thinks that:
“…. the Iraq war was the most radical-liberal revolutionary war the U.S. has ever launched.”
Big ideas, indeed.
In his new column in the Times last week, he came up with another big idea, an idea that is so outlandish and out of step with history that it takes my breath away. In the “world according to Friedman,” “Dubai is the capital of the Arab Spring — the real revolution started here.” Yes, folks, and he had more than 3 years to think and research this little ‘gem’ of an idea. He goes on to explain, “The Arab awakening did not start because they wanted freedom and democracy. It started in the mind of the average (Arab) who the saw the evidence in Dubai that we could do things that are hard, and we could do them world class (like Dubai Ports and Emirates Airlines).” So it wasn’t the years of Mubarak, Ben Ali, Gaddafi, Salah, and the Bashar dictatorship that sparked the awakening of democracy after all.
I have been watching the Arab Spring closely, have written about it and talked about it extensively. I have been in Egypt three times for extended visits since the revolution. I attended three “One Million Man” marches in Tahrir Square, and during all this time, I never saw a sign for Dubai, the Emirates, or even one chant expressing the right to have a fine, clean airline; the right to have clean bathrooms maybe. Of course as orientalist mindset, Mr. Friedman can understand Arab mind more than Arabs themselves.
As a matter of fact, the Arab Spring started with the escape of the Tunisian dictator Ben Ali, and he went, of all places, to Saudi Arabia, which along with Dubai, and the Emirate sheikhs, are leading a vicious bloody counter revolution, supporting the regimes of old dictators to return them back to power. In Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, and Syria, these powers are making sure that the Arab Spring is dead on arrival before reaching the kingdom’s gates.
Based on Mr. Friedman’s almost racist analysis and oversimplification of Arabs and their struggle, we can surmise that he thinks Arabs don’t aspire for freedom and dignity, like in the west, but rather, they just want malls, iPhones, and good clean airliners like in Dubai and the Emirates
The “Mr. Big Idea Man” offers his simple theories instead of getting into the real issue of western imperialist policy in the Middle East, and the failure of its military expansionism in Iraq and Afghanistan, “So if the Middle East is a region we can neither fix nor ignore, what’s left? I’m for “containment” and “amplification,” he explains. Are we to understand that the problem is that Arabs aspire not to become free citizens with personal dignity and smart leaders, but to become free consumers with an iPod and smartphone. Time for a new big idea man, I’d say.
Arab American TV show Belahdan
A show with accent for those without one
Airs on Public TV, Mondays, 10:30pm
Blogs at The Middle
Ahmed Tharwat,, Continue reading Thomas Friedman, A man with big Ideas !!
Dropping his first iPhone6 in a TV interview “like Hansel and Gretel hoping to follow their breadcrumbs out of the forest, the FBI sifted through customer data collected by san Francisco-area grocery stores in 2005 and 2006, hoping that sales records of middle eastern food, would lead to Iranian terrorists.” reported Jeff stein foreign policy magazine, what is next? falafel breath detector at the airport? Trevor Aaronson’s (whom I had on my show) in his book, the Terror Factory, Aaronson poured through the court records of every terrorism- related prosecution in the us in the ten years following 9/11. a staggering list of 508 defendants, according to U.S government, are considered terrorists.. Continue reading Why iPhone users are more likely to join ISIS than those who eat Falafel…
In 2011 by one estimate the most photographed landmark in New York City was not Rockefeller Center or Times Square; it was the Apple Store on Fifth Avenue. The shimmering glass cube is otherworldly. The $7 million structure stands thirty- two feet high and features a glass spiral staircase wrapped around a glass elevator. A glowing Apple logo floats in the center of the cube. Inside the store, there are no shelves or boxes, just wooden tables with Apple’s glowing products on display. Faithful consumers wander the cavernous interior admiring Apple devices in a virtual “cathedral of consumption.”
In his novel Notre-Dame de Paris, Victor Hugo’s archdeacon looks up at the Notre-Dame Cathedral with a book in his hand and says, “This will kill that. The book will kill the edifice.” Hugo explains the archdeacon’s comment this way:
The Ugliest man alive fitch his brand to beautiful people only.